Google

Friday, November 16, 2007

- CLINTON FIRES BACK SHARPLY...! (Newsmax)

********************************
CLINTON FIRES BACK SHARPLY AT DEMOCRATIC RIVALS ! (Newsmax)

So What's the big deal ? Why do we even care ?

She was just trying to fire the first volley of verbal "spit-balls" at her rivals; trying to appear tougher than her last showing... (when for days after the debate, she pouted and acted like she got her little feelings hurt when the big, bad boys named Edwards and Obama were picking on her... just because she couldn't make a straight statement without flippin' and a floppin').

Let them all throw their mud, jab each other, stab each other and brand one another with labels like untrustworthy, wishy-washy, dishonest and evasive.

Even the Republican candidates are getting in on the mud-slinging at each other.

I DON'T CARE ! MAYBE, Just Maybe... They shouldn't care either.

They should be able to stand straight and tall and let the "mud" slide right off their backs... without having to get down in the mud with the rest of them. BUT that can only be done IF they had a PLAN that actually ADDRESSES REAL LIVE ISSUES !

Forget about the name-calling and SHOW US YOUR DETAILED PLANS regarding better Border Security, improved Health Care, WINNING in Iraq/Afghanistan, ending Poverty in America, removing Illegal Immigrants, Homelessness, or reducing Crime in America.

Or MAYBE they could give us their "Yes" or "No" stance on many of the hot topics of today (abortion, gun control, universal health care, drug wars, crowded prisons, overtaxation, illegal aliens, overtaxed military, and on and on) WITHOUT going into a whole soliloquy and trying to straddle both sides of the fence on the straightforward issues.

Just TELL US WHAT your plan is, WHY you feel it is needed, and HOW you plan to accomplish it for the good of (legal) U.S. Americans everywhere.

Then step back, let us compare their personal qualities and plans... just LET US DECIDE who is the best candidate and which candidates SHOULD have "mud in their eyes".

No comments: